The Value of Video for Technical Students in English Language Classes: Theoretical Foundations and Experimental Verification

UDC 372.881.111.1
Publication date: 20.02.2026
International Journal of Professional Science №2(1)-26

The Value of Video for Technical Students in English Language Classes: Theoretical Foundations and Experimental Verification

Gordienko Marina Vladimirovna

Senior Lecturer, Novosibirsk State Technical University (NSTU)
Abstract: The article presents a comprehensive theoretical analysis and experimental validation of the effectiveness of using authentic video materials in teaching Professional English (English for Specific Purposes) to students of technical specialties. Cognitive, linguodidactic, motivational, and sociocultural aspects of integrating video into the educational process are examined. A description of a pedagogical experiment is provided, confirming the hypothesis about the significant positive impact of systematic work with video on the development of foreign language professional communicative competence. Based on the results, practical recommendations are formulated.
Keywords: Languages for Specific Purposes (LSP) teaching, Professional English, Technical English, authentic video materials, multimedia learning, cognitive load theory, motivation, experimental research.


Introduction

The globalization of scientific and technical cooperation and integration into the international educational space impose increased demands on the level of proficiency in English as a language of professional communication (Language for Specific Purposes – LSP) for future engineers and technologists. Bridging the gap between the «academic» language studied in the classroom and the real requirements of the professional environment remains a relevant methodological problem. Traditional textbooks often fail to keep pace with the dynamics of technological development and do not provide sufficient exposure to live, spontaneous professional speech. In this context, authentic video materials (lectures, conferences, demonstrations, interviews, documentaries) serve as a unique didactic resource, modeling situations of professional communication and providing a multimodal (visual-auditory) presentation of contextualized language.

The aim of this article is to build a holistic theoretical model for using video in teaching Technical English based on a synthesis of modern linguodidactic, psychological-pedagogical, and methodological theories, and to empirically test its effectiveness within a controlled pedagogical experiment.

  1. Theoretical Foundations for Using Video in Teaching Professionally-Oriented Foreign Language

The integration of video into the process of teaching Technical English is based on several complementary theoretical platforms.

1.1. Cognitive-Psychological Theories: Multimedia Learning and Cognitive Load.

The fundamental basis is Richard Mayer’s Theory of Multimedia Learning (Mayer, 2009, pp. 1-12; 2014, pp. 31-48). Its key principles directly confirm the effectiveness of video:

Multimedia Principle: People learn better from words and pictures than from words alone. Video simultaneously engages the verbal (speech, subtitles) and visual (dynamic image, graphics, text) channels of information processing.

Spatial and Temporal Contiguity Principles: Corresponding words and images presented simultaneously and close together on the screen (as in high-quality educational or popular science videos) are learned better.

Individual Differences Principle: The effect is stronger for learners with low prior knowledge and high spatial abilities, which is relevant for students just beginning to master professional terminology.

  1. Sweller’s Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 2011, pp. 37-41) explains how properly structured video can optimize the load on working memory. Authentic video, unlike a teacher’s oral explanation, presents information in an integrated, «ready-made» form, reducing extraneous load (the load of processing poorly organized information). The teacher’s task is to manage this load through pre-viewing tasks, activating schemas in long-term memory.

How to Combat Extraneous Load? (Practical Recommendations for Teachers):

Coherence Principle: Remove all extraneous material from videos and slides (decorative graphics, background music).

Split-Attention Principle: Place text next to the corresponding image, not separately. Narrate what is shown on the screen.

Modality Principle: It is better to accompany animation or a diagram with spoken explanation rather than a large amount of on-screen text.

Pre-Training: Provide students with a glossary of terms or introductory information before watching a complex video.

Segmenting: Divide long videos into meaningful parts with pauses for discussion or task completion.

1.2. Linguodidactic Approaches.

Communicative Approach and Task-Based Learning (TBL): Video provides an authentic context for setting real communicative tasks («discuss the engineering solution presented in the clip,» «create instructions based on what you saw»). This moves learning beyond memorized phrases into the realm of meaningful language use for solving professionally significant problems (Ellis, 2003, pp. 27-34).

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Video is an ideal CLIL tool, where language serves as a means of mastering professional content. Students focus on understanding a technical process or concept, while language is acquired incidentally but in a deep context (Coyle, Hood, & Marsh, 2010, pp. 54-67).

Concept of Authenticity: Theories of authentic materials (Guariento & Morley, 2001, pp. 347-349) emphasize the importance of working with resources created by natives for natives, not for educational purposes. This prepares students for perceiving real speech with all its features (pace, accents, natural pauses, informal vocabulary in discussions).

1.3. Motivational and Affective Factors.

Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan): Video can satisfy three basic psychological needs:

Competence: Understanding complex authentic material increases the sense of competence.

Autonomy: The ability to independently choose topics for viewing, control playback speed (with subtitles) provides a sense of control.

Relatedness: The content connects the student with the global professional community (Ryan & Deci, 2017, pp. 80-86).

Reducing Language Anxiety: Video, especially when using subtitles, serves as a «scaffold.» The visual context helps guess the meaning of unfamiliar words, reducing the fear of misunderstanding (Krashen, 1982, pp. 30-32).

  1. Cognitive and Motivational Advantages: In-Depth Analysis

Based on the aforementioned theories, the advantages of video are comprehensive:

Forming Mental Models and Contextualizing Terms: Technical vocabulary is acquired not as an isolated list, but as part of an operating system linked to a visual image of an object or process. This aligns with the principles of semantic networks and enrichment of cognitive schemas (Anderson, 2014, pp. 178-185).

Developing Discursive Competence: Students observe not only what is said, but how: the structure of a professional presentation, argumentation, transitions, nonverbal behavior (gestures, eye contact), which is impossible to extract from text.

Stimulating Professional Identity: Video is a «window» into the world of the future profession, enhancing instrumental motivation and forming the image of «myself as a future engineer in an international environment.»

  1. Practical Implementation: From Theory to Methodology

The effectiveness of using video is determined not by the fact of its use itself, but by the quality of methodological support. Based on cognitive load and task-based theories, a three-stage model is proposed:

Pre-viewing (Anticipation and Removing Cognitive Barriers):Activation of background knowledge (brainstorming on the topic).

Introduction and practice of key terms (based on the principle of load management).

Setting a specific viewing task (focusing attention).

While-viewing (Active Perception and Information Processing):

Tasks for finding specific information, filling out tables, determining the sequence of steps.

Working with subtitles: viewing with English subtitles → viewing without them → discussion.

Post-viewing (Analysis, Practice, and Speech Production):

Discussion within the framework of sociocultural interaction theory (Vygotsky, 1978, pp. 84-91): work in pairs/small groups to solve tasks.

Role-plays, presentations, project work (e.g., create a video commentary on a process).

Reflection and analysis of linguistic means used in the video (transfer to active use).

  1. Experimental Research

Hypothesis: The systematic use of authentic video materials within the proposed three-stage model leads to a statistically significant improvement in the indicators of listening comprehension of professional speech, acquisition of specialized vocabulary, and development of professionally-oriented speaking skills among technical students compared to the traditional methodology.

Methodology:

Design: Controlled quasi-experiment with pre- and post-testing.

Participants: 54 second-year students (average age 19) of engineering majors, divided into an Experimental Group (EG, n=27) and a Control Group (CG, n=27). The groups were equivalent in terms of results from an initial English proficiency test.

Duration: 18 weeks (one academic semester).

Intervention: Authentic video materials (TED Talks on technical topics, fragments of industry webinars, documentary series like «Engineering Connections,» software screencasts) were integrated weekly into the EG’s learning. Work was structured according to the three-stage model with an emphasis on project activities. The CG studied according to the standard program using a textbook, text materials, and educational audio recordings.

Measurement Tools:

Listening Test: Comprehension of a mini-lecture on a technical topic (authentic conference recording).

Vocabulary Test: Active and passive command of the target technical terminology of the course.

Speaking Test: Task on describing/explaining a technological process according to a given scheme using professional vocabulary. Assessed using rubrics: terminology accuracy, fluency, coherence, genre appropriateness.

Motivation Questionnaire (based on Self-Determination Theory scales).

Data Analysis: Student’s t-test for independent and dependent samples was used to compare pre- and post-test results. Significance level p < 0.05.

Results:

Listening: The EG showed significantly greater progress (average score increase +32%, p<0.001) compared to the CG (+14%, p<0.05). The difference between groups in the post-test was statistically significant (p<0.01).

Vocabulary: The EG’s results in the test on active use of terms were reliably higher (p<0.01). EG students demonstrated more contextually appropriate use of vocabulary.

Speaking: Significant improvement was observed in the EG on the criteria «terminology accuracy» and «coherence/structure of utterance» (p<0.01). Progress in «fluency» was also higher, though less pronounced.

Motivation: Questionnaire data revealed higher levels of intrinsic motivation and course satisfaction in the EG, particularly in the aspects of «autonomy» and «competence.»

Discussion of Results:

The results confirm the hypothesis and are consistent with the theoretical premises. The significant progress in listening is explained by constant exposure to diverse authentic speech samples, which trains the skill of auditory decoding in a professional context. The success in vocabulary acquisition and its activation in speech confirms the theses of Multimedia Learning Theory and CLIL regarding the advantages of contextualized, multimodal information presentation. The increase in motivation aligns with the provisions of Self-Determination Theory. The experiment also revealed an area for further improvement: the development of spontaneous speech fluency requires additional, possibly more interactive and game-based work formats at the post-viewing stage.

Conclusion

The theoretical analysis, supported by experimental research data, allows us to assert that authentic video materials are not merely a technical novelty, but a powerful didactic tool whose effectiveness has a solid scientific foundation. Their use aligns with the cognitive features of learning, satisfies key psychological needs of students, and ensures the necessary authenticity and professional orientation of the educational process. For maximum effectiveness, the integration of video must be systematic, methodologically sound (in accordance with the three-stage model), and accompanied by active productive student activity. Promising directions for further research include studying the long-term effect, differentiating approaches for students with different cognitive styles, and developing algorithms for the automated selection of video resources for specific professional profiles.

References

1. Anderson, J. R. (2014). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (8th ed.). Worth Publishers. pp. 178-195.
2. Canning-Wilson, C. (2000). Practical Aspects of Using Video in the Foreign Language Classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11). [Note: Online journal, pages not applicable].
3. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press. pp. 54-80.
4. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press. pp. 27-45.
5. Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347-353.
6. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press. pp. 30-35.
7. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-18.
8. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 31-55.
9. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Press. pp. 80-100.
10. Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press.
11. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Thought and Language. Moscow University Press. pp. 84-95. (In Russian)
12. Zimnyaya, I.A. (2004). Key competencies – a new paradigm of educational outcomes. Expertise. (In Russian) [Note: Specific pages for this reference are not provided in the original].
13. Passov, E.I., & Kuzovleva, N.E. (2010). Fundamentals of Communicative Theory and Technology of Foreign Language Education: A Methodological Guide for Teachers. Russian Language. (In Russian) [Note: Specific pages for this reference are not provided in the original].
14. Polat, E.S., & Bukharkina, M.Yu. (2011). Modern Pedagogical and Information Technologies in the Education System. Academia. (In Russian) [Note: Specific pages for this reference are not provided in the original].
15. Serova, T.S. (2013). Professionally-Oriented Foreign Language Teaching in a Non-Linguistic University: Theory and Practice. Perm National Research Polytechnic University Publishing House. (In Russian) [Note: Specific pages for this reference are not provided in the original].
16. Solovova, E.N. (2018). Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages: An Advanced Course. AST: Astrel. (In Russian) [Note: Specific pages for this reference are not provided in the original].
17. Tarnaeva, L.P. (2018). Using authentic video materials in teaching professional English to technical university students. Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University, (6), 87-92. (In Russian)